P. Deepak @ Dipu @ Goura v. State Of Odisha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 10577 of 2022 P. Deepak @ Dipu @ Goura & Others ....
Petitioners Mr. S.K. Jena, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....
Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
21.11.2022 Order No.
01.
1.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
3.
The petitioners are accused in connection with G.R. Case No.988 of 2022, pending in the Court of the learned J.M.F.C., Khallikote, arising out of Khallikote P.S. Case No.393 of 2022, for alleged commission of offences under Sections 457/380 of IPC. 4.
Being aggrieved by the rejection of their application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Khallikote, by order dated 13.09.2022 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.
5.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that because of the criminal proclivity, the petitioners have been remanded in the case at hand and since they are in custody from 23.07.2022, their further continuance in custody is unwarranted.
6.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail relying on the order of rejection, which indicates that the petitioners are accused in number of cases.
7.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the implication in the case at hand is on account of co-accused statement inasmuch as the FIR was against unknown persons. 8.
Taking into account the period of detention and conclusion of investigation, this Court directs the petitioners to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin over the matter.
9.
Keeping in their criminal proclivity of the petitioners, it is directed that the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer once every week till submission of final form. 10.
Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.
11.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Ayesha