Sarat Chandra Mohapatra v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 796 OF 2015 Sarat Chandra Mohapatra .....

Petitioner Mr. B. Dash, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

11.02.2022 Order No.

I.A. No. 284 of 2022 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. B. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

This application has been filed by the petitioner for amendment of the cause title of the writ petition. 4.

Considering the grounds stated in the petition and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, prayer for amendment is allowed as per schedule.

5.

I.A. stands disposed of.

6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he has already filed consolidated copy of the cause title. Office to verify.

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE P.T.O.

Order No.

WPC (OAC) No. 796 of 2015 The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to regularize his service from the date on which his co-workers (NMR-high skilled) were regularized in service, i.e., 14.01.1999 and further seeks direction to pay the arrear salary to him w.e.f. 14.01.1999 within a stipulated time.

2.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that though the petitioner has already made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexures- 12 and 13, which are still pending, he may be permitted to file a fresh representation before opposite party no.1 highlighting his grievance along with the citations in support of his case, and direction may be given to consider the same within a stipulated time. 3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, but, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner, with regard to the grievance made in this petition, files a fresh comprehensive representation before the opposite party no.1 within 15 days hence, the same shall be considered by the said authority and pass a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation along with the authenticated/certified copy of this order.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE