Umesh Chnadra Biswal v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 4732 of 2016 Umesh Chandra Biswal and Ors.

.....

Petitioners Mr. S. Behera, Adv.

Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties Mr. N.K. Praharaj, Standing Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

17.08.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to pay them the total amount of basic pension plus DP and accordingly the basic pension may be multiplied by 1.86% and 40% of the basic pension as per ORSP Rules, 2008. 3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioners have made representation to the opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-7 and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time. 4.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioners vide Annexure-7, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production/communication of certified copy of this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE