Sushanta Kumar Tripathy v. State Of Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) No. 107 of 2014 Sushanta Kumar Tripathy ....
Petitioner Mr. S. Mallik, Advocate -versusState of Odisha & others ....
Opp. Parties Mr. R.N. Mishra, AGA for opposite parties 1 to 6 None for Ops.7 to 22
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO Order No.
ORDER
08.04.2022 01.
1.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2.
The writ petition has been registered before this Court on 9th December, 2021 after the O.A. was transferred from the learned State Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack upon its abolition.
3.
On perusal of the available order sheets of the learned Tribunal, it is indicated that the matter was never taken up after 20.04.2016.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no up-to-date instruction to pursue the matter at present on behalf of the petitioner.
4.
The O.A.
was filed in the year by the applicant/petitioner who was aged about 40 years, working as Gram Rojgar Sevak under the Block Development Officer, Basudevpur (opposite party no.4) claiming the promotion to the post of Village Level Worker as he was not considered for getting promotion.
// 2 // 5.
Learned Addl. Govt. Advocate referring the counter filed before the learned Tribunal submits that the petitioner/applicant could not have got the benefit of promotion as his entry to service is dated 15.02.2008 and according to his entry to the service, he could not come under the zone of consideration for getting promotion of Village Level Worker. 6.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of for lack of up-to-date instruction from the petitioner to pursue the litigation, granting liberty to revive the same within sixty days for any surviving cause of action. (M.S. Sahoo) Judge RJ