Seshadev Sanbada v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) No. 28883 of 2022 Seshadev Sanbada .....

Petitioner Mr. B. Sahoo, 1, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and another .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

02.11.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect within three days.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party no.2 to implead the petitioner in Encroachment Case No. 4-548 of 2021 on due consideration of Annexures-2, 3 and 4 and to provide due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-5 and direction may be given to consider and dispose of the same, taking into consideration Annexures-2, 3 and 4, within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.2 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5, taking into consideration Annexures-2, 3 and 4 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)