Raghunath Paitasingh v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC(OAC) No. 3041 of 2015 Raghunath Paltasingh ....

Petitioner Mr. Subhasish Satapathy, Advocate along with Mr. B.K. Nayak, Advocate -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opp. Parties Mr. Ramanath Acharya, Standing Counsel (School and Mass Education Department)

CORAM:

JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO Order No.

ORDER

06.07.2022 01.

RJ 1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The writ petition has been registered before this Court on 21st December, 2021, after the original application was transferred from the learned Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack upon its abolition.

3.

On perusal of the available order sheets of the learned Tribunal, it is indicated that notices were issued on 19.08.2015 and the matter was never taken up/pursued thereafter nor there is any further pleadings by any of the parties.

4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has no up-to-date instruction to pursue the matter at present.

5.

Learned Standing Counsel, School and Mass Education Department referring to the averments made in the writ petition submits that considering the nature of

// 2 // grievances raised in the writ petition, nothing would survive after a lapse of seven years.

6.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of for lack of up-to-date instruction from the petitioner to pursue the matter at present granting liberty to the petitioner to revive the petition within sixty days for any surviving cause of action. (M.S. Sahoo) Judge