Ashwini Samal@Aswini Samal v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMC No. 2091 OF 2021 Ashwini Samal @ Aswini Samal & another .........

Petitioners Mr. Arijeet Mishra, Adv.

-versusState of Odisha & another ............

Opposite Parties Mr. D.Mund, AGA Mr. Siba Prasad Mishra, Advocate for O.P. No.2

CORAM:

JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

29.03.2022 Order No.

03.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.2 (informant) and the learned State Counsel.

3.

Relying on the recitals in the affidavit, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.2 states that the informant does not want to proceed against the present Petitioners as the matter has been settled amicably on compromise between the parties, which is the subject matter of G.R. Case No. 1520 of 2018 arising out of Keonjhar Sadar P.S. Case No. 289 of 2018 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Keonjhar.

\

4.

Taking into account such compromise and in view of the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. Vrs. The State of Gujarat and Anr; reported in AIR 2017 SC 4843, the proceeding in connection with G.R. Case No. 1520 of 2018 arising out of Keonjhar Sadar P.S. Case No. 289 of 2018 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Keonjhar stands quashed in respect of the Petitioners in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

5.

Accordingly, the CRLMC stands disposed of.

6.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

( V.Narasingh ) Judge Dhal