Bijaya Kumar Das v. State Of Odisha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No.4409 OF 2015 Bijaya Kumar Das .....
Petitioner Mr. B.Dash, Advocate Vs.
State of Odisha and others .....
Opposite party State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
10.01.2022 Order No.
I.A. No. 24 of 2022 This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.
2.
Heard Mr. B. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.
This application has been filed by the petitioner for amendment of the cause title of the writ petition. 4.
Considering the grounds stated in the petition and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, prayer for amendment is allowed as per schedule.
5.
I.A. stands disposed of.
6.
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he has already filed consolidated copy of the cause title. Office to verify.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE P.T.O.
Order No.
WPC (OAC) No. 4409 of 2015 The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to regularize his service from the date on which his co-workers (NMR-high skilled) were regularized in service, i.e., 14.01.1999 and further seeks direction to pay the arrear salary to him w.e.f. 14.01.1999 within a stipulated time.
2.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that though the petitioner has already made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-4 series, which are still pending, he may be permitted to file a fresh representation before opposite party no.1 highlighting his grievance along with the citations in support of his case, and direction may be given to consider the same within a stipulated time.
3.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, but, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner, with regard to the grievance made in this petition, files a fresh comprehensive representation before the opposite party no.1 within 15 days hence, the same shall be considered by the said authority and pass a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation along with the authenticated/certified copy of this order.
4.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may
utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court's Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021 and Court's Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos. 514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.
Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE