Aldrin Anthony Dungdung v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) No. 29089 of 2022 Aldrin Anthony Dungdung .....

Petitioner Mr. M.K. Mohapatro, Adv.

Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

03.11.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash Annexures-4, 5 and 6 and to issue direction to the opposite party no.4 to refer the matter to opposite party no.3 for settlement of the said land in favour of the petitioner under Section-8A of the OPLE Act. 3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to file objection/appeal before the authority concerned highlighting the grievances and direction may be given to consider the same within a stipulated time, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection.

4.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner, with regard to the grievance made in this petition, files objection/appeal before the authority concerned, within fifteen days hence, the said authority shall consider the same and pass a reasoned and speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation along with the certified copy of this order. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J)