Sabitri Pradhan v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.C (OAC) No.4050 of 2014 Sabitri Pradhan ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

20.04.2022

1. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- (i) To direct the Respondents to up-date her Service Records without further delay (for which the applicant has had no fault nor responsibility), so as to get her career-records up-to-date and ready with seniority positions in tact over her Juniors including the Resp.No.9 as Per Annexure-8, for availing her due right for legitimate consideration for promotion to the next higher rank, her fat end of Service career; however after due regularization of the period from 16.01.1997 to 21.01.2007 at the earliest in view of the fact-situations of unnecessary delay caused out of conspiracy hatched up by the Respondent No.9 under mala fide reasons;

and (ii) To grant any other fit, proper and equitable relief, the applicant is entitled to, in the facts and circumstances of the case".

4.

Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of

// 2 // his claim, if any, within a period of four weeks hence. 5.

It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opp. Party No.1 shall do well to take a lawful decision within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.1 be communicated to the petitioner. 6.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat