← Library
Orissa High CourtWPC(OAC)/3524/2014dismissed for defaultnonprosecution

Laxman Meher v. State Of Odisha

2022-04-11Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.C (OAC) No.3524 of 2014 Laxman Meher ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

11.04.2022

1. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- (i) Pass order directing the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 5 to count and include the previous service period of the applicant for the period 06.07.1965 to 29.06.1970 with breakage of two days as per Rule 6 and 7 of the Orissa Aided Educational Institutions Employees Retirement Benefit Rule, 1981 as qualifying service period and Revise the pension and sanction pensionary benefits and allow the original application.

(ii) Pass any other order or orders as would deem fit and proper and allow the original application".

4.

Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the Opp. Party No.5 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence.

// 2 // 5.

It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opp. Party No.5 shall do well to take a lawful decision within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.5 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat