← Library
Orissa High CourtWPC(OAC)/3519/2014disposed off

Chaitanya Charan Sethi v. State Of Odisha

2022-04-12Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.C (OAC) No.3519 of 2014 Chaitanya Charan Sethi ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

12.04.2022

1. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- (i) To direct the respondents to declare the post of applicant OVS class-I, Group-A (Sr.

Branch) in the pay band-3 in the scale of Rs.15,600-39000/- with grade of Rs.6600 w.e.f 25.4.12 as per resolution dtd.24.4.12 under Annexure-2 and grant all consequential and service benefits.

(ii) To direct the respondents to release the differential salary consequent upon the up gradation of post of applicant to OVS Class-1, Group-A (Sr. Branch) in accordance with resolution dtd. 24.4.12 under Annexure-2.

(iii) To direct the respondents to delete the name of applicant from the list of provisional gradation list in respect of OVS Class-I (Jr. Branch) and place his name in the list of OVS Group-A (Sr. Branch).

(iv) And pass such other order / orders as may be deemed fit and proper for the interest of justice".

// 2 // 4.

Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence. 5.

It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opp. Party No.1 shall do well to take a lawful decision within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat