Ramanth Nayak v. Sate Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC(OA) No.264 of 2013 Sri Ramannath Nayak ....

Petitioner Mr. Bibhudutta Biswal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. B.K. Barik, Advocate -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opp.Parties Mr. D. Mund, Addl. Govt. Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO

ORDER

24.02.2022 Order No.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. The writ petition has been renumbered and registered before this Court on 10.08.2021 after being transferred, upon abolition of Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar. On perusal of the available order-sheet of the learned Tribunal, it is found that the matter was never taken up after 13.11.2017.

The original application was filed by the applicant/petitioner before the learned Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar in the year 2013, after the applicant had retired from service, as Sub-Inspector of Police in the Cuttack & Bhubaneswar Commissionerate challenging the charge memo dated 27.07.2009 initiating proceeding no.7 of 2009 under the provisions of the OCS (CCA) Rules,1962. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they do not have any up-to-date instruction to pursue the present litigation on behalf of the petitioner.

// 2 // Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that by efflux of time nothing would survive in the writ petition for determination and in any event initiation of the disciplinary proceeding is in accordance with law as per the relevant Service Rules and conditions.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.

( M.S.Sahoo) Judge Gs