Dolamani Budhia v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No.29335 of 2022 Dolamani Budhia & Others .....

Petitioners Mr. D.K.Sahu, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Others .....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

18.11.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The Petitioners have filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this writ petition, with issue Nisi calling upon the opposite parties to file show cause as to why the opposite party No.4 be directed to not to disburse the compensation in favour of the opposite party no.5 and 6 and till the finalization of RoR of present case within a stipulated time, if the opposite parties fails to file show cause and show insufficient cause this Hon'ble Court would be make absolute the said rule and issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ/Writs directing the opposite parties not to disburse compensation till the finalization of RoR of the petitioners within a stipulated time" 4.

Taking into account the submissions made, the Petitioners are permitted to make fresh representation before Opp. party No.2 in that regard within a period of two weeks from today. 5.

It is observed that if such representation is filed by the

Petitioners ventilating their grievance, the same shall be considered by Opp. party No.2 in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 6.

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Subrat (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (B. P. SATAPATHY) JUDGE