Shri Bhimsen Mallick v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC(OA) No. 1202 of 2012 Bhimsen Mallick ....

Petitioner Proxy counsel Ms. Sobhana Sahoo, Advocate -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opp. Parties Mr. T.K. Praharaj, Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO Order No.

ORDER

22.02.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

RJ The writ petition has been registered before this Court on 7th August, 2021, the original application having been transferred from the learned State Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Bhubaneswar upon its abolition.

2.

On perusal of the available order sheets of the learned Tribunal, it is indicated that the matter was never taken up after 04.07.2017.

3.

Learned proxy counsel submits that due to unfortunate demise of the earlier counsel engaged, she has instruction to appear on behalf of the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is no up-to-date instruction from the petitioner to pursue the present litigation. 4.

The original application was filed before the learned Tribunal by the applicant/petitioner in the year 2012, who had retired from service as Male Nursing Orderly, Circle Jail, Sambalpur, challenging the order passed by the Government refusing certain allowances like dress

// 2 // allowances, washing allowances etc.

5.

It is submitted by the learned proxy counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to revive the same within sixty days for any surviving cause of action.

6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.

(M.S. Sahoo) Judge