Ramesh Chandra Biswal v. State Of Odisha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAPPC) No.473 of 2016 Ramesh Chandra Biswal & Others ....
Petitioners -versusState of Odisha & Ors.
.... Opposite Parties COROM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
26.08.2022
01. 1.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
Order No 2.
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.
3.
The Petitioners have filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "(i) In view of the facts stated above, the applicants pray that this Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to admit the original application, call for the record, and after hearing the parties be pleased to set aside the so-called decision in respect of RACPS under the joint review meeting held on 7th & 8th January, 2015 and also further direct the respondents to extend the benefit of RACP counting the period of service from the initial date of appointment and benefit of RACP scheme be extended in terms of the Resolution dated 06.02.2013 and further direction be made to set aside / modify Clause-1 of the letter dated 11.08.2016 issued by respondent No.1 and the trained scale of pay be allowed to applicant Nos.2 and 3 as per the statutory Rules"
4.
Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the
// 2 // Petitioners are directed to make fresh individual representation before the Opposite Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of their claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence. 5.
It is observed that if such individual representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opposite Party No.1 shall do well to dispose of the representation on its own merit within a period of three months. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioners within that time.
6.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat