Kishore Ch. Panigrahi v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OA) No.2115 OF 2013 Kishore Ch. Panigrahi .....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Khatei, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Anr.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

28.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the order of disengagement under Annexure-7 and direct to the opposite parties to allow him to continue as J.E./GPTA with all benefits.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-8 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5. As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the

petitioner vide Annexure-8 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE