Prasanna Kumar Pani v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 1712 of 2017 Prasanna Kumar Pani .....

Petitioner Mr. K.P. Mishra, Sr. Adv.

Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

30.08.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to grant five years of additional qualifying service in terms of Rule-32 of the Orissa Civil Service pension Rule, 1992 and Rule-114 of the aforesaid rules and further seeks direction to the opposite parties to release the pension and other retiral benefits within a stipulated time.

3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be disposed of taking into consideration Annexures-6 and 7, within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection. 4.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5 taking into consideration Annexures-6 and 7, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production/communication of certified copy of this order. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE