Jadumani Sahoo v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.C (OAC) No.4279 of 2014 Jadumani Sahoo ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

13.04.2022

1. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- (i) The respondents be directed to regularize the services of the applicant from the date on which his co-workers (NMR-high skilled) were regularized in service i.e. 14.01.1999.

(ii) To pay the arrear salary to the applicant from 14.01.1999, from which date the respondents have paid the arrear salary to the co-workers and other service benefits which are available to the applicant.

(iii) Any other appropriate order (s), direction (s) may kindly be passed / issued to the respondents as this Hon'ble Tribunal considers fit and proper".

4.

Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence. 5.

It is observed that if such a representation is filed within

// 2 // the aforesaid period, the Opp. Party No.1 shall do well to take a lawful decision within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat