← Library
Orissa High CourtWPC(OAC)/541/2012disposed off

Manoj Kumar Das v. State Of Odisha

2022-06-21Mr. Justice M.S.Sahoo2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 541 of 2012 Manoj Kumar Das ....

Petitioner Mr. Satyajit Behera, Advocate -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opp. Parties Mr. S.N. Patnaik, AGA

CORAM:

JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO Order No.

ORDER

21.06.2022 04.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has no up-to-date instruction from the petitioner to pursue the matter at present. Earlier on 26.04.2022, the following order was passed:- "On 28.3.2022 the following order was passed after hearing learned counsel for the parties:

1. This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2. When the matter was taken on 18.02.2022, the following order was passed:

"1. This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2. The matter having been transferred from the learned Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack upon its abolition, has been registered as a writ petition before this Court on 26.11.2021.

3. On perusal of the available order sheets of the learned Tribunal, it is indicated that the matter was never taken up after 26.4.2012.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the Original Application, the applicant had sought for a direction to give him the salary for the period of suspension after it is regularized. It is further submitted that since the matter is pending since long, he may be accommodated to obtain up-to-

// 2 // date instruction from the petitioner."

5. Accordingly, list on 28.3.2022.

4. To grant another opportunity to the petitioner, list on 26.4.2022.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be granted further time to obtain instruction as prayed for earlier.

4.

As prayed for, list on 21.6.2022."

3.

Learned AGA reiterates the submissions on behalf of the State-opposite parties as indicated in the said order. 4.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of for lack of up-to-date instruction from the petitioner to pursue the matter at present granting liberty to revive the same within sixty days for any surviving cause of action.

RJ (M.S. Sahoo) Judge