Satrughna Parida v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) No. 29959 of 2022 Satrughna Parida .....

Petitioner Ms. B. Pradhan, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

15.11.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.1 to regularize the period of service of the petitioner w.e.f. from 01.07.2017 to 19.08.2019 (25 months) and pay the salary for that period, within a stipulated time.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made appeal before the opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-4 and direction may be given to consider and dispose of the same within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.1 to take a decision on the appeal filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)