Sailabala Das v. State Ofodisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.C (OAC) No. 235 of 2013 Sailabala Das ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Others ....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order

ORDER

23.02.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

No.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Department.

3.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that in view of the subsequent development taken place during pendency of the matter, he wants to file a fresh representation before the opposite party No.2 within a period of three weeks with regard to his claim. Hence, it is directed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the said opposite party No.2 will take a decision on the same on its own merit within a period of three months thereafter. The opposite

// 2 // party No.2 is also directed to communicate the order so passed within the said period to the Petitioner.

4.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition (OAC) is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat