Sri Prasanta Kumar Panigrahi v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No.179 OF 2013 Prasanta Kumar Panigrahi .....

Petitioner Mr. S.N. Sharma, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

23.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.1 to consider and dispose of his representation dated 12.07.2012 under Annexure-7 within a stipulated period.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-7 and the same may be directed to be considered taking into consideration Annexures-5 & 6 within a stipulated time to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5. As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite

party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-7 and pass appropriate order taking into consideration Annexures-5 & 6 within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE