Bulu@Anil Ku Sahoo v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMA No. 306 of 2022 Bulu @ Anil Ku Sahoo ....

Petitioner Mr. D. Mitra, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opposite Party Mr. A. Pradhan, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

13.12.2022 Order No.

01.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

This CRLMA has been filed for modification of order dated 03.11.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge Nayagarh in B.A. No.481 of 2022.

3.

It is submitted that though the petitioner has been directed to be released on bail on 03.11.2022 by the learned Sessions Judge Nayagarh, but because of one of the condition i.e, one of the sureties must be family member of the accused, the petitioner is not able to furnish such security for which he is still in custody. 4.

Prima facie this Court does not find any infirmity in the order passed taking into account the nature of allegation. 5.

Be that as it may, since the petitioner is still in custody in spite of the order dated 03.11.2022, the condition relating to one of the sureties being family member of the accused stands modified. It shall be open to the petitioner to furnish two local solvent sureties

to the tune of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.F.C, Ranpur.

6.

The condition relating to the sureties being family member of the accused, stands modified accordingly.

7.

The other conditions remain unaltered.

8.

Accordingly the CRLMA stand disposed of.

9.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per the rules.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi