Duryodhan Mahalik v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC(OAC) No. 618 of 2013 Duryodhan Mahalik ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha &Others ....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

28.02.2022 Order No.

01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3.

In view of the nature of the claim made in the Writ Petition and the fact that the Petitioner has retired in the meantime, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a detailed representation claiming extension of the benefit as prayed for in this Writ Petition.

4.

It is observed that the Petitioner may make a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 within a period of three weeks. If such a representation is filed by the Petitioner

// 2 // within the aforesaid period, the opposite party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such application. The order so passed be also communicated to the Petitioner.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the WPC(OAC) stands disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat