Dr. Rhine Chaudhury v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No.692 OF 2013 Dr. Rhine Chaudhury .....

Petitioner Mr. D.K. Panda, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

28.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to absorb her in the post of Dental surgeon and give her regular scale of pay and pay all service and financial benefits retrospectively.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before the authority highlighting the grievances, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court directs the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of fifteen days from today ventilating her grievances before the authority. In the event, the petitioner

files such representation along with this order, the authority shall consider and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months thereafter.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE