Santosh Kumar Panigrahi v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) No. 30368 of 2022 Santosh Kumar Panigrahi .....

Petitioner Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

15.11.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to grant RACP benefits as per the Finance Department resolution dated 05.10.2015 under Annexure-2 as well as the letter dated 17.07.2022 under Annexure-7 and letter dated 02.08.2022 under Annexure-8, within a stipulated time. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-9 and direction may be given to consider and dispose of the same, taking into account Annexure-7 and 8 within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.2 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-9, taking into account Annexure-7 and 8 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)