Dr.Prasanta Kumar Sethi v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OA) No. 1975 of 2017 Dr. Prasanta Kumar Sethi .....

Petitioner Mr. N. Rath, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties State Counsel.

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

02.09.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to grant accrued increment @ 3% towards the increment after promotion of the applicant and to fix his pay appropriately within a time stipulated period keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is a retired government servant.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-6 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned Counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing opposite party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-6, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)