Satyabrata Sahoo v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OA) No. 1562 of 2017 Satyabrata Sahoo .....

Petitioner Mr. M. Pratap, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

30.08.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The Petitioners have filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to grant increments as per Rule-77 of OCS (CC&A) Rules, 1962 and H.R.A. as per Finance Department O.M. dated 31.05.1995 read with order dated 11.06.1996.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners states that highlighting the grievances, the Petitioners have made a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-8 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time taking into consideration Annexure-6, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5.

As agreed to by learned Counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing opposite party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioners vide Annexure-8, taking into consideration Annexure-6 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)