Krushna Chandra Sahoo v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC(OAC) No.3819 of 2013 Krushna Chandra Sahoo ....

Petitioner Mr.P.K.Rath, Advocate -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opp. Parties Mr.S.K.Samal,AGA

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

15.03.2022 Order No.

1.This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2. Heard.

3. The petitioner has challenged the illegal and arbitrary action of the opposite parties in not considering the application of the petitioner to appoint him as Asst.Driver under the opposite party No.3 though he has qualified the test and has been entitled to be appointed against 10% quota earmarked for home guards.

4. Since the matter was of the year 2013, the cause of action must have extinguished by now. Consequently, it has become infructuous.

5. That apart, Mr. S.K.Behera proxy counsel on behalf of Mr. P.K.Rath, Advocate, submits that he does not want to press this bail application. Accordingly, the WPC(OAC) is disposed of as not pressed.

6. However, liberty may be granted to the petitioner to approach this Court afresh, if any cause of action survives.

// 2 //

7. In view of the above, the is disposed of granting liberty as aforesaid.

8. Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

( S.K. Panigrahi) Judge LB