Simanchal Padhy v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No.1580 OF 2017 Simanchal Padhy .....

Petitioner Mr. S.K. Jethy, Advocate Vs.

Commissioner of Police, Bhubaneswar & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

08.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the orders under Annexures-4, 5 & 6 and further to issue direction to the opposite parties to collect only flat rent @ 290/- p.m. from the petitioner till the date he vacated the quarter No.E/8 at OSAT 7th Bn. Campus, Bhubaneswar. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-7 series and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5.

As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner

vide Annexure-7 series and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE