Dipanjali Paramguru v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 4011 of 2011 Dipanjali Paramguru ....

Petitioner Mr. G.R. Sethi, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties Standing Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

15.02.2022 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

Order No.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties to select and appoint the petitioner as constable with effect from the date when others have got appointment in pursuant to selection under Annexure-2 with all benefits.

3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.3 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection. 4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of

production/communication of certified copy of this order. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge Alok