← Library
Orissa High CourtWPC(OAC)/1515/2011disposed off

Chandrai Majhi v. State Of Odisha

2022-10-14Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) (OAC) No.1515 of 2011 Chandrai Majhi ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Others ....

Opposite Parties COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

14.10.2022

2. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard Mr. B.K.Sharma, learned counsel for Petitioner and Mr. M.K.Balabantaray, learned Standing Counsel for the StateOpposite Parties. 3.

The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) to quash / set aside the communication dtd. 10.11.2010 under Annexure-2 issued by respondent no.1 and (ii) to direct the respondents to give employment to the applicant under Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme of O.C.S (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990".

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Opposite Party No.1 without causing any enquiry and without following the relevant guidelines governing the field with regard to issuance of distress certificate, rejected the said claim vide the impugned order communicated on 11.11.2010 under Annexure-2.

5.

Mr. Balabantaray, learned Standing Counsel for the State on the other hand submitted that since the Petitioner has not

// 2 // filed any registered partition deed showing his separation from other family members, the Opposite Party No.2 after due consideration has passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. This Court after going through the impugned order finds that no justifiable reason has been assigned by the Opposite Party No.1 while refusing to issue the district certificate in favour of the Petitioner. Opposite Party No.1 has also not followed the guidelines governing in the field in that regard.

6.

In view of that, this Court is inclined to quash the said order under Annexure-2 and while quashing the same directs the Opposite Party No.1 to take a fresh decision by giving personal hearing to the Petitioner. Such fresh decision shall be taken within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. Petitioner is directed to produce copy of this order before the Opposite Party No.1 within a period of seven days from the date of receipt of this order.

7.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat