Anupam Patra v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMC No. 2284 OF 2021 Anupam Patra .........

Petitioner Mr. Ananga Kumar Otta, Adv.

-versusState of Odisha & Anr.

............

Opposite Parties Miss S. Mishra, ASC & Miss A. Sahoo, Counsel for OP-2.

CORAM:

JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

04.04.2022 Order No.

02.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2.

Heard Mr. Anaga Kumar Otta, learned counsel for the petitioner, Miss S. Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. A. Sahoo, learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party No.2 3.

The aforesaid CRLMC has been filed for quashing of the proceeding in G.R. Case No.953 on the file of Learned S.D.J.M (S), Cuttack arising out of Cuttack Mahila P.S. Case No. 46 of 2019. During pendency of the CRLMC with the intervention of the family members of both the sides, the matter is stated to have been compromised and settled out of Court.

4.

An Affidavit has been filed by the informant-Opposite Party No.2 evidencing such compromise. It is stated in the said

affidavit inter alia that, the informant-Opposite Party No.2 has no objection, if this Court allows the CRLMC and directs for quashing of the order of cognizance.

5.

In view of the submissions made and taking into account the affidavit of the informant and in tune with the law laid down by the Apex Court in case of Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karkur and others v. State of Gujarat and another, reported in AIR 2017 SCC 4843, the proceeding in connection with G.R. Case No.953 on the file of Learned S.D.J.M (S), Cuttack arising out of Cuttack Mahila P.S. Case No. 46 of 2019 stands quashed, in exercise of power Under Section-482 Cr.P.C.

6.

The CRLMC thus stands disposed of.

7.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule. ( V.Narasingh ) Balaram Judge