Ashamani Dei v. Ashamani Dei

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 2947 of 2017 Ashamani Dei .....

Petitioner Mr. S.K. Nayak (3) Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties Mr. S. Rath, ASC

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

05.09.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to the Opposite Parties to release the arrear salary of the petitioner for the period from 26.05.2001 to 20.09.2003 treating the same as duty pay and to release all other consequential benefits.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-13 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned Counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-13, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE