Bijay Kumar Tripathy v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 4360 of 2011 Bijay Kumar Tripathy .....

Petitioner Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

15.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. 2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party no.1 to give the revised monthly remuneration @Rs.9300/- from 20.07.2010 under Annexure-6 and dispose of the representation under Annexure-7 series.

3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already made representation before opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-7 series, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time taking into consideration Annexure-3 and 6 within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection.

4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner under

Annexure-7 series taking into consideration Annexure-3 and 6, and pass a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE