Lingaraj Satpathy v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.30825 OF 2022 Lingaraj Satpathy & Ors.

.....

Petitioners Mr. N.C. Das, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

18.11.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.1 to disburse their arrear salary w.e.f. 01.01.2016 to 31.09.2017 as due and admissible to them within a stipulated period.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure10 and the same may be directed to be considered and disposed of within a stipulated time taking into consideration Annexure-5, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner

vide Annexure-10 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law taking into consideration Annexure-5 within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE