← Library
Orissa High CourtWPC(OAC)/3330/2017disposed off

Paresh Chandra Mohanty v. State Of Odisha

2022-09-08Dr. Justice B.R.Sarangi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 3330 of 2017 Paresh Chandra Mohanty .....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

08.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner has filed this application seeking direction to opposite parties to allow the petitioner grade pay of Rs.4600 and Rs.4800/- with effect from the date of eligibility of getting 2nd and 3rd RACP.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that similar question had come up for consideration before a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 2831 of 2016 disposed of on 27.06.2016 (State of Odisha and another v. Bihari Lal and others), which was arising out of an order dated 12.03.2015 passed by the State Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 520 of 2014 and this Court quashed the order dated 21.12.2013 (wrongly mentioned as 21.12.2012 in the

judgment) and held that the applicants are eligible to get financial upgradation in the posts of GPEO/PA, ABDO/SDPO and DPO on completion of 10/20/30 years of service in the post of VLW under the RACP scheme. Therefore, the petitioner's case may be considered in the light of the said judgment.

5.

Learned Addl. Government Advocate states that if the Division Bench of this Court has resolved the issue, then the petitioner may approach the authority concerned ventilating his grievance.

6.

Considering the contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned by filing representation brining the notice of the authority the judgment in Bihari Lal (supra), to which the authority shall apply his mind and pass appropriate order within a period of four months from the date of communication of this order. While considering the grievance of the petitioner, the order dated 06.02.2013 in Annexure-5 will be taken into consideration.

7.

With the above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE