Mandardhar Sahoo v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No.2119 OF 2011 Mandardhar Sahoo .....

Petitioner Mr. S. Mallick, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

22.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.3 to take necessary action to release the differential arrear salary of Rs.54,619/- for the period from 07.06.1994 to 31.11.1995 and differential arrear amount of Rs.2,50,217/- after fixation of scale of pay from 01.01.1996 to 31.12.2001 as per pay revised scale of pay introduced by the Finance Department w.e.f. 01.01.1996.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.3 vide Annexure-3 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5. As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-3 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE