Antaryami Naik v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.14958 of 2022 Antaryami Naik ....

Petitioner Mr. Dayanidhi Mishra, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opposite Party Mr. M.K. Mohanty, A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No.

ORDER

09.12.2022 01.

1. Heard the learned counsels for the Petitioner and the State.

2. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks grant of bail U/s.438 Cr.P.C. in apprehension of arrest for his alleged involvement in the offences U/s. 341/294/323/379/506, I.P.C. in connection with Dhenkanal Town P.S. Case No.612 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1459 of 2022 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Dhenkanal.

3. Considering the facts and submissions, nature of allegations, the circumstances appearing, the seriousness and gravity of the offences, while this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail, however it is directed that, in the event the Petitioner surrenders and moves for bail before the learned S.D.J.M., Dhenkanal in the aforesaid G.R. Case within a period of three weeks from today, he shall be allowed to go on bail on such terms and conditions as

// 2 // would be deemed just and proper by the said court, but subject to the following further conditions - (i) The Petitioner shall appear before the I.O. and shall cooperate with the investigation as and when required;

(ii) He shall also appear before the trial court on each date fixed for trial, till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) He shall not indulge in any other offence of similar nature to the present one in any manner whatsoever.

(iv) He shall not threaten, intimidate, terrorise, ill-treat or harass the Informant and his family members including the prosecution witnesses in any manner and shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever, while on bail. (v) Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of bail of the Petitioner.

4. The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly.

( Chittaranjan Dash ) Judge S.K. Parida