Bramha Suna v. Lalatendu Mishra, Collector, Boudh.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CONTC No.6977 Of 2021 (Through hybrid mode) Bramha Suna and others ....

Applicants Mr. Trilochan Nanda, Advocate -versusLalatendu Mishra, Collector, Boudh ....

Alleged Contemner Mr. A.K.Sharma, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA

ORDER

08.04.2022 04.

1.

Mr. Nanda, learned advocate appears on behalf of applicants Order No.

and submits, his clients' be given liberty to raise the contentions by way of separate writ petition.

2.

Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of alleged contemner and submits, his client has filed compliance affidavit.

3.

It appears from submissions made on behalf of applicants that there has been compliance and applicants' grievance cannot be adjudicated in contempt jurisdiction. In event applicants have grievance on which the writ Court can moved, no leave is necessary. 4.

The contempt application is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Prasant