Kartika Nayak v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC(OAPPC) No.61 of 2017 Kartika Nayak & Others ....

Petitioners -versusState of Odisha & Ors.

.... Opposite Parties COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

16.11.2022

01. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioners have filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "(i) direct/order the State Respondents to reckon the regularization of services of the applicants from 1st date of appointment for pension and thereby release the financial benefit(s) of regularization to the applicants from the date of judgment, i.e.. 19.09.2000 passed in T.A. No.78(C) of 1993 O.J.C No.1381 (C) of 1991.

(ii) pass such other order(s) or issue direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the bona fide interest of justice".

4.

Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioners are directed to make fresh individual representation before the Opposite Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of their claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence.

// 2 // 5.

It is observed that if such individual representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opposite Party No.1 shall do well to dispose of the representation on its own merit within a period of three months. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioners within that time.

6.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat