Dr.Nabakrishna Sahoo v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) (OA) No.2299 of 2019 Dr. Nabakrishna Sahoo ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Others ....

Opposite Parties COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

11.10.2022

2. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.

3.

The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) Admit and allow the Original Application. (ii) The Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the Respondents to regularize the service period and fix his salary at an appropriate stage.

(iii) The Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the Respondents to disburse the arrear salary accrued due to fixation of pay, within stipulated period.

(iv) That, applicant also seeks the intervention of this Hon'ble Tribunal for issuance of such other appropriate direction as may be necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case".

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has filed a representation at Annexure-7 to the Writ Petition, before the opposite party No.1 but till date nothing has been

// 2 // done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to opposite party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period. 5.

Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs opposite party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

6.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat