Sunil Brahma v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 27 of 2019 Sunil Brahma and others .....

Petitioners Mr. R. Roy, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

27.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioners for regular appointment as Village Level Worker (VLW) with usual pay, grade pay, DA and other allowances as admissible to regular employees from the date of contractual engagement.

3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be permitted to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned highlighting the grievances and direction may be given to consider the same within a stipulated time, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection.

4.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioners, with regard to the grievance made in this petition, files a fresh comprehensive representation before the authority concerned, within fifteen days hence, the said authority shall consider the same and pass a reasoned and speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation along with the certified copy of this order.

5.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)