Soura Bihari Das v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) (OA) No.1277 of 2019 Soura Bihari Das ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha .... Opposite Party COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

11.10.2022

01. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State- Opposite Party.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "(i) The Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to declare that the applicant is entitled to get Grade Pay of Rs.6,600/- on 3rd financial upgradation under RACP Scheme and accordingly applicant's pay be fixed with Grade Pay of Rs.6,600/- instead of Rs.5,400/- on 3rd financial up-gradation by quashing the order at Annexure-6, and (ii) The Hon'ble Tribunal be further pleased to pass appropriate order directing the respondents to pay the consequential differential arrear salary and to extend the revised pensionary benefits with arrears as accrued in favour of applicant, within a time bound period, and (iii) The Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass such other order/orders as deemed fit and proper".

// 2 // 4.

Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioner is directed to make fresh representation before the Opposite Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5.

It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opposite Party No.1 shall do well to dispose of the representation in accordance with law within a period of 3 (three) months. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioner within that time.

6.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat