Sunil Kumar Pradhan v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAPC) No. 226 of 2019 Sunil Kumar Pradhan .....

Petitioner Dr. J.K. Lenka, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

28.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to declare that the petitioner is deemed to be continuing in old OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 and entitled to all the benefits under the said Rules. He further seeks direction to the opposite parties to consider his case as per the judgment of the tribunal in O.A. No. 1440/2012 disposed on 20.06.2014, O.A. No. 1397/2014 disposed of on 07.07.2014 and O.A. No. 1923 of 2015 dated 12.07.2016 and grant the benefits within a stipulated time. 3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already made representation before opposite party no.3 vide Annexure-7, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time taking into consideration Annexure-6 within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection. 4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of directing opposite party no.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner under Annexure-7 taking into consideration Annexure-6 by passing a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified

copy of this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE