Ambarish Moharana v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) (OAC) No.990 of 2019 Ambarish Moharana ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Others .... Opposite Parties COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

13.10.2022

01. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State- Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "(a) Therefore, the humble applicant prays that your Lordship would be graciously pleased to pass an order directing the respondent No.1 and 3 for obsurp and appoint the applicant in Class-III post under rehabilitation assistance scheme;

(b) To quash the Annexure-7 vide order dt.4.4.2019 passed by D.E.O., Puri;

(c) Pass any other order/orders in favour of the applicant as deemed just and proper for sake of interest of justice and fairness; And for which act of your kindness the humble applicant shall as in duty bound ever pray".

4.

Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioner is directed to make fresh representation before

// 2 // the Opposite Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of two (2) weeks hence.

5.

It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opposite Party No.1 shall do well to dispose of the representation in accordance with law within a period of 2 (two) months. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioner within that time.

6.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat