Rabindra Kumar Lenka v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No.842 OF 2019 Rabindra Kumar Lenka .....

Petitioner Mr. B.C. Ghadei, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

29.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner for trained matric teacher w.e.f. 10.03.2007 on the basis of the letter with revised scale of pay under ORSP Rules, 2008 vide Annexure-4 as he has crossed the age of 48 years and regularize his services accordingly. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-7 series and the same may be directed to be considered taking into consideration Annexure-6 within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection. 5.

As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party

no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-7 series and pass appropriate order in accordance with law taking into consideration Annexure-6 within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE