Krushna Chandra Sahoo v. Ao, Canara Bank, Bbsr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 32057 of 2022 Krushna Chandra Sahoo and others .....

Petitioners Ms. Adisha Mohanty, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Mishra, AGA

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

22.12.2022 Order No.

03.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Ms. Adisha Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 07.04.2022 passed in Misc. Case No. 16 of 2021, which has been filed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

4.

At the outset, this Court raised the question with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition, to which learned counsel for the petitioners contended that since there is violation of principle of natural justice, this writ petition is maintainable. But this Court is not satisfied with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners since the very same question can be raised before the forum who can adjudicate the same. 5.

In course of hearing learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue his remedy before the appropriate authority.

6.

With that liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (B. P. SATAPATHY) JUDGE