Biswajit Oram v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 32271 of 2022 Biswajit Oram .....

Petitioner Mr. B.K. Pattanaik, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

06.12.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties 3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 17.09.2018 under Annexure-6 and to direct the opposite parties to give appointment to the petitioner under Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.4 vide Annexure-3 and direction may be given to consider and dispose of the same, within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for State has no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.4 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-3, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)